FT Executive Education Rankings 2020: methodology and key

Lavern Vogel

This is the twenty second edition of the Money Occasions rankings of the world’s top suppliers of customised and open-enrolment government education and learning programmes. The customised rating characteristics the leading eighty five small business educational facilities — these are programs tailored to the training demands of the organisations that […]

This is the twenty second edition of the Money Occasions rankings of the world’s top suppliers of customised and open-enrolment government education and learning programmes.

The customised rating characteristics the leading eighty five small business educational facilities — these are programs tailored to the training demands of the organisations that fee them. The 2nd rating includes the leading seventy five educational facilities for open-enrolment programmes — programs on unique topics, these kinds of as management, that are directed to industry experts irrespective of their employer. A third, combined rating lists the leading 50 educational facilities for government education and learning, calculated from the customised and open tables.

Educational facilities taking portion have to be internationally accredited by either Equis or AACSB and have earned revenues of at the very least $2m in 2019 from either their customised or open-enrolment non-degree programmes. This year, a overall of 107 educational facilities took portion in either or equally rankings.

The rating of customised training course suppliers is compiled employing information from the small business educational facilities and their corporate consumers in 2019. Each individual college have to nominate a bare minimum of 20 consumers. At the very least 5 of them have to total the FT study for a college to be eligible for the last rating.

The FT study was concluded by 1,135 small business college consumers this 12 months — a reaction rate of fifty six for each cent. Each individual rated their programme on a ten-place scale according to a variety of indicators. Their solutions right advise the initial ten of the ranking’s criteria, from training course design and style to follow-up and future use, which account for a combined 80 for each cent of the ranking’s bodyweight.

Customer responses are weighted according to programme sort. Clientele pick just one of 3 possibilities to categorise their programme: strategic (delivered to leading management and developed to impact a company’s course) general (delivered to management on operational features of a business) or useful (associated to a unique functionality, these kinds of as marketing). Strategic programmes have the premier weighting and consequently the greatest effect on the rating.

Responses are also weighted according to the seniority of the individual responsible for specifying the training course, the sizing of the consumer organisation and the amount of educational facilities with which that consumer has commissioned customised programs in the previous 3 decades.

The past 5 criteria are calculated from info presented by educational facilities on international consumers, overseas programmes, advancement, lover educational facilities and college variety.

The open-enrolment rating is compiled employing information from training course suppliers and people who concluded their nominated management programmes in 2019. Educational facilities submit one or two general programs of at the very least 3 days in length and just one or two superior programs of at the very least 5 days. At least 20 for each cent of these programmes’ individuals have to total the FT study, with a bare minimum of 20 concluded surveys, for a college to be regarded in the last rating.

A overall of 5,480 individuals answered this year’s open programme study — a reaction rate of 37 for each cent — ranking elements of their training course on a ten-place scale. Responses by superior and general-level individuals are combined to compute the initial ten rating criteria.

These criteria, which contain the quality of the individuals, of the instructing and the relevance of the capabilities they gained, advise 80 for each cent of the rating. School information are made use of to compute the remaining criteria on woman and international individuals, advancement, international site and lover educational facilities.

For equally rankings, info gathered in the preceding two decades is made use of, where by available, to compute criteria knowledgeable by consumer and participant responses. If a college has participated for the previous 3 decades, the weighting is forty:33:27, with 2020 information counting for forty for each cent. If two decades of info is available, the weighting is 55:forty five, with 2020 information accounting for 55 for each cent.

The weightings accorded to the initial nine and ten criteria in the customised and open rankings, respectively, are established by the level of significance consumers and individuals attach to each in their surveys for the 2020 rating. Weightings for these criteria consequently range a bit from 12 months to 12 months.

Educational facilities that characteristic in equally rankings are eligible for the combined in general rating. The leading 50 educational facilities are calculated according to an equal weighting of the overall scores reached in equally rankings, fairly than an common of rating positions.

Judith Pizer of Pizer-MacMillan acted as the FT’s databases expert

Critical: Customised-enrolment programme

(weights for rating criteria are proven in brackets as a proportion of the in general rating)

The initial ten criteria, up to and together with “Future use”, are primarily based on information from the companies that commissioned government programs.

The next 5 are primarily based on information reported by small business educational facilities. Educational facilities are rated for each of these criteria. The past classification, “Total responses‡”, is for info only and does not advise the rating.

Figures in brackets demonstrate the bodyweight each criterion contributes to the in general rating. The weighting accorded to the initial nine criteria, from preparation to price for funds, accounts for 80 for each cent of the overall ranking’s bodyweight. It is established by the level of significance that consumers attach to each.

Preparing (8.3): level of conversation between consumer and college, the extent to which clients’ strategies have been built-in into the programme, and the effectiveness of the college in integrating its latest analysis.

Programme design and style (8.four): flexibility of the training course and the willingness of educational facilities to enhance their college with external experts.

Instructing approaches and materials (seven.nine): extent to which instructing approaches and materials have been modern and proper, and bundled a ideal mix of educational rigour and functional relevance.

College (8.four): excellent of instructing and the extent to which instructing workers labored collectively to existing a coherent programme.

New capabilities and finding out (8.3): relevance of capabilities gained to the office, the relieve with which they have been carried out, and the extent to which the course encouraged new techniques of contemplating.

Abide by-up (seven.3): extent and effectiveness of follow-up supplied following the training course individuals returned to their workplaces.

Aims reached (8.four): extent to which educational and small business anticipations have been achieved, and the excellent of feed-back from individual individuals to training course commissioners.

Facilities (seven.four): ranking of the finding out environment’s excellent and advantage, and of supporting assets and facilities.

Worth for funds (seven.seven): clients’ ranking of the programme’s design and style, instructing and materials in terms of price for funds.

Potential use (8.): probability that consumers would reuse the similar college for other customised programmes in the future, and no matter if they would recommission the similar programme.

International consumers (5.): primarily based on the proportion of consumers with headquarters outside the house the small business school’s foundation place and region.

Abroad programmes (2.): international access of the school’s customised programme instructing.

Expansion (5.): primarily based on the in general advancement in revenues from customised programmes as perfectly as the advancement in revenues from repeat small business.

Husband or wife educational facilities (3.): amount and excellent of programmes developed or taught in conjunction with other Equis or Affiliation to Progress Collegiate Educational facilities of Business enterprise (AACSB) accredited small business educational facilities.

College variety (5.): variety of college college according to citizenship and gender.

Total responses: amount of individual surveys concluded by the school’s consumers. Figures in brackets point out the amount of decades of study information counted to the rating.

Critical: Open up-enrolment programme

(weights for rating criteria are proven in brackets as a proportion of the in general rating)

The initial ten criteria are primarily based on information from programme individuals the next 6 are primarily based on information submitted by the small business educational facilities. Ranks are proven for each of these criteria, apart from “Female participants”, which exhibits the proportion. Figures in brackets demonstrate the bodyweight each criterion contributes to the in general rating. The weighting accorded to the initial ten criteria, from preparation to facilities, accounts for 80 for each cent of the overall ranking’s bodyweight. It is established by the level of significance that individuals attach to each.

Preparing (seven.seven): provision of superior info on programme material, and the participant range system.

Program design and style (8.six): flexibility of the training course and appropriateness of class sizing, framework and design and style.

Instructing approaches and materials (8.3): extent to which instructing approaches and materials have been modern and proper, and bundled a ideal mix of educational rigour and functional relevance.

College (8.seven): excellent of the instructing and the extent to which instructing workers labored collectively to existing a coherent programme.

High-quality of individuals (seven.nine): extent to which other individuals have been of the proper managerial and educational normal, the international variety of individuals and the excellent of conversation between friends.

New capabilities and finding out (8.seven): relevance of capabilities gained to the office, the relieve with which they have been carried out, and the extent to which the training course inspired new techniques of contemplating.

Abide by-up (seven.3): level of follow-up supplied following individuals returned to their workplaces, and networking opportunities with fellow individuals.

Aims reached (8.four): extent to which own and specialist anticipations have been achieved, and the probability that individuals would propose the programme.

Meals and accommodation (six.8): ranking of the excellent of food and accommodation.

Facilities (seven.six): ranking of the finding out environment’s excellent and advantage, and of supporting assets and facilities.

Female individuals (2.): proportion of woman training course individuals.

International individuals (3.): primarily based on the proportion of individuals from outside the house the small business school’s foundation place and region.

International site (2.): extent to which programmes are operate outside the house the school’s foundation place and region.

Expansion (5.): primarily based on the in general advancement in revenues from open programmes as perfectly as the advancement in revenues from repeat small business.

Husband or wife educational facilities (3.): amount and excellent of programmes taught in conjunction with other Equis or AACSB accredited small business educational facilities.

College variety (5.): variety of college college according to citizenship and gender.

Next Post

Electronic health records fail to detect up to 33% of medication errors

Despite improvements in their overall performance about the earlier ten years, digital health data usually employed in hospitals nationwide are unsuccessful to detect up to a person in a few probably unsafe drug interactions and other medicine faults, in accordance to researchers at College of Utah Wellness, Harvard College, and […]