A decide in Canada has ruled that the U.S. extradition scenario towards senior Huawei Technologies govt Meng Wanzhou can go on given that the allegations towards Meng constitutes a crime in Canada.
Meng, the daughter of Huawei’s founder Ren Zhengfei and main economic officer of the business, was arrested in December 2018 at Vancouver International Airport. She was indicted in January 2019 amid allegations that a Huawei-affiliated business, Skycom Tech, marketed telecommunications tools to Iran in violation of U.S. sanctions.
Meng was also accused of fraud for misrepresenting Huawei’s business enterprise in Iran to the U.S. govt and several economic establishments.
“Ms. Meng’s method to the double criminality investigation would severely limit Canada’s capacity to fulfill its intercontinental obligations in the extradition context for fraud and other financial crimes,” Associate Chief Justice Heather Holmes, of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, wrote in her final decision.
Decide Holmes explained Canada did not have sanctions towards Iran, but the financial sanctions imposed by the United States “were not essentially contrary to Canadian values.”
The U.S. is trying to get Meng’s extradition for prosecution in the Japanese District of New York.
“Huawei is unhappy in the ruling,” the business explained in a statement. “We hope Canada’s judicial program will finally establish Ms. Meng’s innocence.”
The Chinese Embassy in Ottawa, in a statement, explained the United States and Canada were abusing their bilateral extradition treaty and violating the legal rights of 1 of its citizens.
“The reason of the United States is to deliver down Huawei and other Chinese superior-tech businesses, and Canada has been performing in the course of action as an accomplice of the United States,” a spokesperson for the embassy explained. “The whole scenario is entirely a grave political incident.”
Governments in the United Kingdom, United States, and Australia have sought to limit the use of tools manufactured by Huawei in their telecoms infrastructure, arguing the company’s ties to the Chinese govt posed security dangers.